The given first pie chart shows the information about the how energy is used in average australian household as well as second pie chart shows the information about the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy use.
As can be from pie chart shows that, most use of energy in heating system by Australian people, it is 42%, when number of 30% use of energy in water eating technology, which is a decrease by 12%as compared to heating system .In addition to the australian person are utilised to refrigeration as well as other appliance system in daily routine life, it is a 7% and 15% respectively. Apart from the, in cooling system only two person use of energy through Australian masses, which is low by 2% as compared to the lighting technology.
According to, the second pie chart shows that population of greenhouse gas emission in australian household.First of all, high ratio of usage to greenhouse gas emission in water heating and other plant system that is a number of 32% and 28% respectively. Moreover, 8% use of greenhouse gas in lighting system,when it is a slightly increase by 5% than cooling system.
In overall, it can be seen that, australian household are additional use of both greenhouse and energy in water heating system,as well low use of both sources in cooling and lighting technology.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people consider thinking about the future and planning for the future to be a waste of time They argue that people should simply live in the moment Do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 44
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...t pie chart shows the information about the how energy is used in average australian ho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ease by 12%as compared to heating system .In addition to the australian person are...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...se by 12%as compared to heating system .In addition to the australian person are u...
^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...s a 7% and 15% respectively. Apart from the, in cooling system only two person use o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...se gas emission in australian household.First of all, high ratio of usage to greenhou...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , when
...use of greenhouse gas in lighting system,when it is a slightly increase by 5% than co...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...house gas in lighting system,when it is a slightly increase by 5% than cooling system. In overal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...house and energy in water heating system,as well low use of both sources in cooling...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, well, apart from, in addition, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91592920354 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87203592178 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451327433628 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.3495801959 43.030603864 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.166666667 112.824112599 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.6666666667 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6666666667 5.23603664747 280% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.511767005859 0.215688989381 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.279407789397 0.103423049105 270% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183814225079 0.0843802449381 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.354044573896 0.15604864568 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186924881454 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.2329268293 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.