The graph below shows information about the consumption of different types of fast food per person per week in England between 1980 and 2000.
The line graph compares the weekly consumption of three different types of fast food in the UK between 1970 and 1990.
It is clear from the graph that the amount of Fish & Chips consumed per week experienced the most dramatic change during the research period. Additionally, while the quantities of Hamburger and Fish & Chips eaten both rose significantly, there was a slight decrease in the figure for pizza.
In 1970, the amount of Pizza consumed was highest, at more than 300 grams, while the figure for Hamburger was significantly lower, at only around 30 grams. Meanwhile, approximately 80 grams of Fish & Chips were eaten by UK people. In 1985, Pizza consumption slightly fell and reached the lowest point of 200 grams, whereas the other two figures gradually went up.
In 1990, Fish & Chips weekly consumption increased dramatically to 500 grams and became the highest figure in the line graph, while Hamburger’s figure experienced a slight rise to about 300 grams. At the same time, the amount of Pizza eaten remained stable at roughly 200 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-08 | kchocielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-08 | kchocielts | 73 | view |
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by luck Do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays consumer goods are cheaper to buy Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to encourage more local people to visit these places 78
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72559292215 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594285714286 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7483443346 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139507184082 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719058287454 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104627785388 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123279320928 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116085806046 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.