The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The four given charts illustrate the result of questionnaires from a nation in the American area in order to know the main purposes of teenagers using phones in school in four years; 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.
It is clear that the teenagers using phones in school for checking social networks was seen a vast majority in the proportion of four main reasons. Contrastly, the percentage of use for phone calls was seen to drop gradually over each period.
In 2016, half the percentage of the entire reason was registered for social networks, after that, this figure fell slightly to 48% before climbed to 51% and 56% in 2018 and 2019 respectively. Similarly, the digital camera was at 15% in both years 2016 and 2017, then increased marginally to 18% and reached a peak in 2019, at 20%.
Regarding using email, in the initial year, it was reached at a quarter of the total percentage, and this was followed by an unconsiderable decrease to 24% and 20% in 2017 and 2018 before hit the lowest point at 19% in 2019. It was similar for phone calls, 13% was seen in 2017 that more than 3% in 2016 and experienced a decline to 11% in 2018. After that, this data plummeted to under 5% in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-06 | ndiep | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | nguyetminh_2301 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | taman150507 | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | quynhhuong656 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | anna103 | 84 | view |
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 61
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the 56
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52534562212 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53478004929 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566820276498 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4308840934 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17452802909 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082864752351 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604416997258 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123130793585 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551343529046 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.