What are the pros and cons of children watching television?
Whether or not watching television for children is useful has always been a unsolve dilemma. Many believe that watching television is an excellent way to keep abreast of national and international events. On the flip side, some say it is a ghastly phenomenon and brings much trouble for us, much more than what we imagine. In this essay, both sides will be discussed and followed up, in my opinion.
It is often suggested that staring at television by children is meritorious for two main reasons. First of which is that the magic box can increase their knowledge of the outside world. Many high-quality programs, such as documentary, can broaden their horizon and help them understand many fields of study. Secondly, it can be very useful for non-native speakers who can enhance their fluency with it. Tele can bring them a useful source by which they can increase vocabulary and practice listening around the clock.
Turning to the other side of the argument, there is a myriad of several disadvantages to kids watching television. First and foremost, of course, it brings humankind a pleasant way to relax and spend leisure time. However, it can easily kill most of their precious daily time. An example may help clarify the point. In many countries, teenagers watching the tube more than doing any other activity such as studying and sleeping. It can surely entail many physical and mental ailments, including depression and unresolvable eye damage. Another reason is that most of the programs that have been watched through the magic box are not suitable for kids. They effectively spread all kinds of violent actions to the world, which undeniably affect them more than others. Parents must quickly realize the dangers that menace their children from that innocent Box and take the initiative and make an about-face decision about what kind of shows they can saw and for how long.
By way of a conclusion, it can be stated that the drawbacks of looking at the TV are more than their benefits. Nevertheless, the question is: Can it improve the health and happiness of youngsters in general? Only time will tell, but in the meantime, watching television will continue to influence every aspect of kid's everyday lives, some of which necessitate more comprehension.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-03 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
| 2024-12-02 | ngocminhho | 56 | view |
- School teachers are more responsible for social and intellectual development of students than parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25-44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whe 73
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working from home 84
- What are the pros and cons of children watching television 84
- aircrafts have been increasingly used to transport fruits and vegetables to some countries where such plants hardly grow or out of season some people consider it a good trend but some people oppose it discuss both views and give your own opinion 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not watching television for children is use...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... for children is useful has always been a unsolve dilemma. Many believe that watc...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in general, kind of, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00793650794 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67507414251 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579365079365 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7868813985 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1428571429 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151291654802 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450680532053 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645956946313 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102299872484 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618749123903 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.