Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Humans always get influence by people around them. People who they communicate with them. Students also get influence by their teacher and their friends. Personally speaking, I think students are more influenced by their friends than their teachers. Some people might have another opinion about that, but I agree with the proposed statement in the question. I will mention some reasons, points, and my experiences to defend my opinion below.
First, In my mind, generally, students get more influence from them who have the same age. I do not know a scientific reason for that, but I have my theories for holding that belief. Students spend more time with their friends. The friends are with them in a hard and happy situation, and they help each other in the time. So, they can easily trust each other and because there will be a strong emotion between them, they will follow each other and imitate the works that their friend does. For example, I am a student at a university. I have my friends. I have many close friends, we are with each other more of a day. we do our homework together and when we are tired, we go outside and take a walk together. Sometimes, I repeat the action that my friends do automatically without understanding I am doing it, but I do not repeat the actions that my teachers do.
Second, In my perspective, all students get far from their teacher because the teachers are strict with them. Some kind of fear is in the students' hearts about their teachers. The duty that the teachers have, make them serious. They should be serious because if they do not, students will not listen to them. For example, I and my friends listen to our teacher, but we do not get influence by them.
To sum up, according to what I mentioned, I think students are more influenced by their friends than their teachers.
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team.Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, e 76
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues because in fossils the animals living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals Thus scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70 million ye 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- tpo 45 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and example 60
- tpo 27 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
..., we are with each other more of a day. we do our homework together and when we ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for example, i think, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6450617284 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49184579338 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462962962963 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1817300915 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.4090909091 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7272727273 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331342571517 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113260726035 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998121929683 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251472278773 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468361344391 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 11.7677419355 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.57 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 86.8835125448 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.