Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today, because eveyone can see historical objects or art works by computer. Do you agree or disagree?
As the development of computer technology can help us to see historical objects or artworks through digital screens, many people widely accept that museums and art galleries are no longer necessary. Personally, I totally disagree with these ideas because of their irreplaceable role in both tourism industries and cultural and historical conservation.
In terms of tourism, museums and art galleries are tourist attractions of numerous countries as they are considered as masterpieces themselves. To be more specific, such places are attractive and well-known not only for the artworks they possess but also for their astonishing architecture and unique atmosphere which are built carefully by many professional architectures. For instance, the Nature Museum in London is constructed with a well-calculated structure and that aims to optimize the visitors' first-hand experiences. When visitors go sight-seeing inside this museum, they would have the opportunities to see the animal models in the revolutionary orders and in their distinctive habitats like in the wild. Therefore, they could fully experience and immerse themselves in vivid museums. In contrast, computer screens can only bring them pictures and some relevant descriptions, which are quite informative but boring.
On the other hand, the presence of museums and art galleries is crucial for the preservation of tangible cultural and historical heritages. Specifically, these places are designed to provide suitable environmental conditions, such as temperature or humidity, to store objects and artworks and ensure they are not degraded over time. Furthermore, displaying such objects in museums or galleries helps to show the human's appreciation towards the heritages of the world. This is an effective way to present to the young generation our attitudes to these objects; and accordingly, educate them to appreciate the history and culture.
In conclusion, museums and art galleries play an essential role in both developing the tourism industry and preserving the cultural and historical heritages. Therefore, I completely disagree with the viewpoint that they are no longer needed because of the appearance of computers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-16 | happycathappy | 78 | view |
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because eveyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that hard work and determination bring success Others thtink other factors such as money and good appearance are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- It is common nowadays for each member of the family to have their own piece of modern technology Some people think this will lead to a break down in family relationships and communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... museums or galleries helps to show the humans appreciation towards the heritages of t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7370030581 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22898709762 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0150903746 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269304358287 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883618769124 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772178385128 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178926136562 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658785714885 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.