As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom.
Along with the rapid development of science and technology, computers are getting increasingly crucial and applied widely in almost every field of life, not excepting for education. It is so essential that some people fear that they will take place of teachers' role in the classroom. From my point of view, I assume that there is no machine which can be responsible for the link among people that is all-important for a classroom, and what we should focus on is a change of teachers' role when having the support of digital meterials like computers.
There is no doubt that the nature of computers are the equipment that supports the process of teaching, nothing more. This device has changed the traditional way of teaching through that fact that exploring and observing actual images about lessons gives joy and exciment for children, which contributes to a better grasping of new knowledge in the learning process. Thanks to such modern academic meterials, every source of information that is necessary for the acquisition of knowledge is at the fingertip.
However, compared to computers which are attached to the inflexible academic digital equipments, the interaction between teachers and students is always present. Only teachers are able to evaluate the emotion and level of each individual so that they represent methods in harmony with subjects. Regardless of how sophisticated the software is, the way teachers impart information for children can hardly be mimicked by computers.
As computers become increasingly widespread, teachers nowadays should be aware of their role in the classroom by means of reaching their fullest potential as a guider. To sum up, teachers play an indispensable role which computers can not replace.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-28 | Blueberry123 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | SKN | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-20 | rahulchd | 89 | view |
| 2021-03-20 | wisdompath | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28776978417 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90952720978 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597122302158 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4823877828 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.636363636 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329982512894 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10917973783 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655111082373 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178516220825 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572149239367 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.