Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Is economic progress the most essential target to achieve in the road to national prosperity? A significant part of states argues that the growth of economy is of greater importance than any progressions in other spheres. While other people, however, assume economic progress to be only a part of the goal, being equally as important as social or political.
As for my personal opinion, I believe that economic progress could be the driver for the prosperity of other spheres of a state development. However, it all depends on the current level of development of a country.
On the one hand, economic progress plays a pivotal role in the prosperity of developing countries, such as Russia, China or Brazil. For example, China, that is country with fastest development growth, becomes the one only by maintaining the economic growth with the help of introduction of factories, technologies, and proper monetary policy. As another instance, Russia once became the leading state only after some significant changes were introduced in the economic sphere, meaning that the currency policy was transformed as well as the whole budgeting system was modified.
On the other hand, the economic growth of the majority of the developed countries, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, you name it, is now driven by the progresses in other spheres. For example, the innovations in Sweden medicine correspond to the greatest part in the GDP of the country. The hi-tech development for the USA, as well as for Singapore, is the main factor of growth now, meaning that prosperity of these countries and their growth is fully driven by technology and innovation and not the economy itself. Moreover, Milan, being the oasis of fashion and beauty, is a progressive city now thanks to growth in these spheres.
Summarizing the aforementioned examples, I can conclude that both economic progress and developments in other spheres could be equally essential for the prosperity of a state. Nevertheless, one sphere or another could stand out in different stages of a country’s development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-19 | hiva farahani | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...ss to be only a part of the goal, being equally as important as social or political. As f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 11, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...tant as social or political. As for my personal opinion, I believe that economic progress could...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the fastest'.
Suggestion: with the fastest
...il. For example, China, that is country with fastest development growth, becomes the one onl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, as for, for example, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97522285722 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501501501502 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2797097792 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.214285714 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267527750711 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998431221394 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657874240032 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16162148268 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706920451295 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.