The graph below shows avarage carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line chart illustrates the average CO2 each person produced in the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal in the period 1967 - 2007.
In the general , it is clear that there was a gradual increase in the amount of CO2 emissions in Italy and Portugal, while the opposite was witnessed in the UK and Sweden.
In 1967, each person in Portugal emitted about 1.6 metric tonnes CO2. This figure increased gradually over the years and hit a peak of approximately 5.7 metric tonnes in 2007. A similar trend happened in Italy, the amount of CO2 started off at around 4.1 metric tonnes, rising moderately and hitting a peak of 7.8 metric tonnes at the end of the period.
In the UK, the amount of emitted CO2 per person began at roughly 10.7 metric tonnes in 1967, decreasing gradually throughout the years and hitting a lowest point of nearly 9 metric tonnes in 2007. A considerable fluctuation was experienced in Sweden, after hitting the highest point of about 10.5 metric tonnes in 1977 from around 9 metric tonnes in 1967, the figure dropped considerably and finally hit a record low of around 5 metric tonnes in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-14 | fmichela | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | Tso0921 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-04 | fmichela | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | nguyen duc | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | nguyen duc | 67 | view |
- The chart and table give information about what nursing graduates did in the UK in 2009
- The diagrams be low show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country, while some people think there are other factors. What other factors should be considered? Within these factors, do you think anyone is more important than the others? 73
- The graph below shows avarage carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the period 1967 - 2007. In the general , it is clear that there was a gradual in...
^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...dually throughout the years and hitting a lowest point of nearly 9 metric tonnes ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70256410256 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51311589485 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492307692308 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.0180780498 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210947253514 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132779166022 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891039950097 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167988060788 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711704309931 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.