Some people work for the same organisation all their working life.
Other think that it is better to work for different organisation.
Some people work for a single company for their whole working life, instead other people try to change their work across their life.
These are both valid life philosophy but I think a person that keeps his position for a very long period of time tends to start decreasing his interest and his vocation for his job, thus provocing a drop of entusiam and bringing him to never exit his comfort-zone.
Someone can truly object that working for the same organization and having the same job for some time produce in a person an improvement of abilities and thus successes, bringing him to gain higher positions and roles.
Furthermore job-finding is nowadays the hardest task for any kind of worker and can easily scare anyone.
In my experience I saw that a person with some good attitude towards hard working and with a solid base of knowledge can find a new job without much trouble.
Neverless never pushing ourself into different, and not always simple, situations can limit our mind and our way of thinking. Instead looking for new work experience can open our eyes and can let us see the work world around us in a different prospective, forcing us to change our point os view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-28 | Kuie | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | alireza.ahmadi.computer | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | dhruvp12 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | anazari | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-22 | Kulwant kaur | 67 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Other think that it is better to work for different organisation 56
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and further projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras In many case theh people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 73
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...that keeps his position for a very long period of time tends to start decreasing his interest ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...im to gain higher positions and roles. Furthermore job-finding is nowadays the hardest tas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easily scare anyone. In my experience I saw that a person with some good attit...
^^
Line 8, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...limit our mind and our way of thinking. Instead looking for new work experience can ope...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, thus, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 207.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74879227053 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51848865973 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618357487923 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 506.74238477 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.17122516 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.428571429 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368688164648 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16644758931 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168270732663 0.0667982634062 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186814698132 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168182985716 0.056905535591 296% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.