Some people believe that charity organizations should give the aid to those who are great needs, while others think that charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in their own country. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
According to many people, humanitarian foundations should help the people living under their national boundaries, however, others opine that they should provide assistance to the person who is greatly needed. In my standpoint, it depends on the missions and the resources of each organization. As my opinion, both given justifications will be discussed in depth.
On the one hand, if national charitable organizations only send help to their residents, we do not have the right to blame them. After all, the resources of these organizations almost come from local people, the government or benefactors who live in their countries. As a result, the missions of local foundations are satisfying donnor who are eager to see resolutions to the problems that are affecting their countries or communities, which are also badly effective to their companies and families. Additionally, the limited sources of social organizations, which make the issues-solving-process in their countries sometimes stuck, are the next reason that prevents them from supporting other people that are unrelated. Take one example, in many developing countries where organizations have seen the shortage of resources, hence, giving help to other nations is impossible. If these charities attempt to do this, they will become out of sources, moreover, this is a precursor of becoming a burden on the international community.
On the other hand, there are many international organizations flush with cash and other resources such as medicine were created to solve the worldwide problems. For instance, UNICEF is an international foundation which was formed with the obligation of helping children around the world. They receive funding from affluent countries and thus they are capable of offering assistance in any part of the world. Moreover, the international community, especially developed-nations, build up these organizations to solve the consequences that they made in the past. A particular example is Africa, due to the racial discrimination, the developing-process in many Africa countries had been slowed down, this is a precursor of many social issues such as the lack of financial resources or unemployment. Consequently, Africa countries have no ability to solve their problems.
In conclusion, while there is a contrast in opinion of many people about the way social organizations should give their help, I still maintain the view that who they should help or where they should provide help depends on their financial situation and objectives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-04 | Hoangquan0912 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-04 | Hoangquan0912 | 56 | view |
- all towns and cities should have large public spaces 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that charity organizations should give the aid to those who are great needs while others think that charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in their own country Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that charity organizations should give the aid to those who are great needs while others think that charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in their own country Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people think that robot technology is very important for our future Some others believe that robots are dangerous invention and have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...sult, the missions of local foundations are satisfying donnor who are eager to see resolutions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, after all, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50256410256 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33869785291 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0558728726 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.125 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315480573528 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916306294321 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881577949614 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216814623196 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961587200166 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...sult, the missions of local foundations are satisfying donnor who are eager to see resolutions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, after all, as for, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50256410256 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33869785291 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0558728726 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.125 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315480573528 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916306294321 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881577949614 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216814623196 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961587200166 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.