Some people believe that charity organizations should give the aid to those who are great needs, while others think that charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in their own country. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
According to many people, humanitarian foundations should help the people living under their national boundaries, however, others opine that they should provide assistance to the person who is greatly needed. In my standpoint, it depends on the missions and the resources of each organization. As my opinion, both given justifications will be discussed in depth.
On the one hand, if national charitable organizations only send help to their residents, we do not have the right to blame them. After all, the resources of these organizations almost come from local people, the government or benefactors who live in their countries. As a result, the missions of local foundations are satisfying donnor who are eager to see resolutions to the problems that are affecting their countries or communities, which are also badly effective to their companies and families. Additionally, the limited sources of social organizations, which make the issues-solving-process in their countries sometimes stuck, are the next reason that prevents them from supporting other people that are unrelated. Take one example, in many developing countries where organizations have seen the shortage of resources, hence, giving help to other nations is impossible. If these charities attempt to do this, they will become out of sources, moreover, this is a precursor of becoming a burden on the international community.
On the other hand, there are many international organizations flush with cash and other resources such as medicine were created to solve the worldwide problems. For instance, UNICEF is an international foundation which was formed with the obligation of helping children around the world. They receive funding from affluent countries and thus they are capable of offering assistance in any part of the world. Moreover, the international community, especially developed-nations, build up these organizations to solve the consequences that they made in the past. A particular example is Africa, due to the racial discrimination, the developing-process in many Africa coutries had been slowed down, this is a precursor of many social issues such as the lack of financial resources or unemployment. Consequently, Africa countries have no ability to solve their problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-04 | Hoangquan0912 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-04 | Hoangquan0912 | 56 | view |
- all towns and cities should have large public spaces 78
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 73
- Some people think that robot technology is very important for our future Some others believe that robots are dangerous invention and have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give opinion 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that charity organizations should give the aid to those who are great needs while others think that charity organizations should concentrate on helping people who live in their own country Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...sult, the missions of local foundations are satisfying donnor who are eager to see resolutions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Africa seems to be countable; consider using: 'many '.
Suggestion: many
...scrimination, the developing-process in many Africa coutries had been slowed down, this is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, after all, as for, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5549132948 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40611074845 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554913294798 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6113633691 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.133333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245957065177 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736968128264 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617061404771 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171519793851 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072895382966 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.