Many countries are famous amongst tourist for their museums, monuments and historical buildings. However the locals do not show much of the interest in visiting such sites. The locals do not want to go to such sites as it is already over crowded by the tourists. In order to make these people to visit these places, government can lay off the entry fees for the locals and also try to bring in the new items in the museum to attract the local people.
Countries that have preserved their historical sites and museum that display ancient artifacts are very much popular among tourists. The main reason for people to travel to another country is to learn more about a country's culture and tradition, which can be gained by visiting these ancient sites. Many people say that these places are not much popular among locals. This is because the locals already know about these historical events and culture as they are part of that community. Also, another reason is such famous places are already over crowded by the visitors, so they avoid visiting them. A survey conducted in Udaipur by Trip Advisor, stated that 82% of the people visiting Maharana Pratap Palace in the city are foreigners.
On the other hand, government can play an important role in order to attract more locals to visit these ancient monuments. They can offer free entry to the people staying in the locality, this way they can be encouraged to visit these sites to refresh their cultural events. Apart from this, government can put some new artifacts in the museum that can help the locals to learn more about their own tradition, and even can open an all new section in a museum where people can learn more about different traditions in the world.
In conclusion, historical places and museums will definitely have more footfalls from other region or other country, rather than the locals. So, to keep the locals interested in such ancient monuments government needs to come up with different innovative ideas to attract local people to visit these places again and again.
- Children can learn effectively from watching television which is why it should be encouraged at school and at home To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However It is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should writ
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ms, monuments and historical buildings. However the locals do not show much of the inte...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'monuments'' or 'monument's'?
Suggestion: monuments'; monument's
...p the locals interested in such ancient monuments government needs to come up with differ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, apart from, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86857142857 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33832313893 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465714285714 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5446022649 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502229781693 0.244688304435 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166186477568 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711326795374 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321867364491 0.151304729494 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333322508497 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ms, monuments and historical buildings. However the locals do not show much of the inte...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'monuments'' or 'monument's'?
Suggestion: monuments'; monument's
...p the locals interested in such ancient monuments government needs to come up with differ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, apart from, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86857142857 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33832313893 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465714285714 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5446022649 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502229781693 0.244688304435 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166186477568 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711326795374 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321867364491 0.151304729494 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333322508497 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.