Nowadays, opinions vary with regard to the trends amid major environmental threats affecting the population existence. It is absolutely apparent that problem of the rapid extinction of endangered species of birds and animals has the increasing tendency. But simultaneously, many other environmental problems, such as global heating and universal pollution, harm the Earth population dramatically. The current issue will be considered from both sides after getting my personal attitude.
On the one hand, the extinction of particular part of animals leads to the significant break in food chains and biosphere processes. All representatives of the animal world play a pivotal role in food chain structure, but the disappearance of predators will foster the environmental problems rather substantially and instantaneously. For instance, the extinction of lions or tigers, which take the top place in food chain hierarchy will promote the fast-paced spread of herbivores. The existence of these animals in excessive amounts would harm the farm yield, what deprives the majority of population of food supplies and finally brings people to the global hunger.
On the other hand, during several previous decades, our climate has changed dramatically, what causes number of current issues worldwide. Due to the global air and water pollution and green house effects we are experiencing the rapid patterns in increasing temperatures, in other worlds global heating. The temperature values grow up to several degrees each 10 years what inevitably causes the ice melts in the polar areas. The increase in sea levels follows from the previous fact subsequently, and the several coastal areas are under danger to be submerged into the ocean waters in foreseeable future. In addition, the demolishing in ozone layers rises the radiation proportion penetrating the land surface: thus, people become more susceptible to following illnesses as cancer and other health disorders.
To conclude, despite the enormous harm caused by the death of plethora of animal species, the remaining environmental problems lead to more substantial detrimental effects. These last factors jeopardize the very population existence rather largely.
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animals all over the world Some people think that it is too late to do something about it Others think that there is still time to take effective action Discuss both view and give your own opinion 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, thus, for instance, in addition, such as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67267267267 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08490124879 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630630630631 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5142285813 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.933333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182471362665 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555944256753 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441403894303 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11136742916 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391136161571 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, thus, for instance, in addition, such as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67267267267 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08490124879 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630630630631 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5142285813 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.933333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182471362665 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555944256753 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441403894303 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11136742916 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391136161571 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.