The table below shows the information about the percentages of the first-year university students rating at "very good" about 5 aspects of their course in 2003
The graph compares different course sectors in a university in terms of proportion evaluated by freshman students in 2003. Overall, it is clear that top-rated aspect among business, computing and maths was definitely tutor support while the opposite was true for resource.
Looking at the information in more detail, with regard to business, tutor support was on the top, with about 96%. It is followed by teaching quality which stood at 93%, while the course content’s proportion was much less ( just 74%). By contrast, proportions for the remaining types as resource and pre-course information stayed much lower, ranging from over a half to 62% in each sections. Moreover, there were some similarities between computing and business in terms of almost the figures expect the course content. The percent of course content in computing accounted for 69%, which was slightly lower than in business.
In addition, the math’s figure is far much different from the mentioned major. Even though, the tutor support’s percentage was by far the most popular at 90%, a striking point to note is that 72% math students chose the course content as the second favorable aspect. Furthermore, pre-course information and teaching quality were in the same quantities (at 64%) while about half the students opted for resource.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-10 | JolieNguyen | 85 | view |
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The line graph gives information on the cinema attendance in the UK
- The line graph shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a 6 month period in 2011 73
- The table below shows the information about the percentages of the first year university students rating at very good about 5 aspects of their course in 2003 85
- The graphs below show the percentages of people using public transportation and private cars in different cities in Australia between 2000 and 2010 92
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tutored'.
Suggestion: tutored
...ess, computing and maths was definitely tutor support while the opposite was true for...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourse content’s proportion was much less just 74%. By contrast, proportions for t...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t half the students opted for resource.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, while, in addition, of course, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2619047619 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73039912194 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.806249322 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202621384993 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080964584175 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575252096752 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146493646279 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330294018367 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tutored'.
Suggestion: tutored
...ess, computing and maths was definitely tutor support while the opposite was true for...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourse content’s proportion was much less just 74%. By contrast, proportions for t...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t half the students opted for resource.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, while, in addition, of course, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2619047619 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73039912194 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.806249322 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202621384993 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080964584175 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575252096752 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146493646279 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330294018367 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.