It is very important for parents and children to spend quality time together. Unfortunately, these days, those taking up the role of parents seem to be preoccupied with other interests and spend far less time with their kids than people did in the past. This essay will explore why this is, and attempt to explain the effects of this phenomenon.
To begin, modern day parents and children have access to many novel forms of technology. It is very common to see families sitting in the same room but not mentally or physically engaging with one another. This may be because of the amount of time both adults and young people are spending on devices such as smartphones and gaming consoles. Various manifestations of social media have shown to be quite addictive and, although in some cases can bring people closer, also seem to be driving them apart. Furthermore, people are having less children in general. This means that, overall, less adults are interacting with less children. Family sizes decrease as people become more focused on their career prospects rather than family prospects.
Next, it is important to consider if children are more affected than parents, or vice versa. An argument could be made that both segments of the population are equally affected, but over different time frames. It could be argued that in the short-term, children will be more adversely affected as they require guidance and supervision from infancy to around 18 years of age. Without proper mentoring, young children and teenagers risk falling into a life of drug abuse and crime. Parents may also experience hardships as a result of a lack of time spent with their offspring. Middle-aged adults, men especially, tend to have mid-life crises once they realize that they have not lived a life that is in accordance with their family and career circumstances.
In conclusion, it is clear that parents and children need each other. Children need guidance, and parents have parental instincts to fulfill. Failing to achieve that would result in negative consequences to both sides. Perhaps in the future, schools will offer courses in which both parents and children can learn the value of having a strong family bonding.
- The pie chart below shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 61
- The pie chart illustrates the information of graph shows the demand for electricity in england during typical days in winter and summer. It shows the average of electricity in england . 89
- Many countries have compulsory military service for men after they leave school It would be a good idea to adopt this system for men and possibly women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 64
- Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun children is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...m apart. Furthermore, people are having less children in general. This means that, o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun adults is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...n in general. This means that, overall, less adults are interacting with less childr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun children is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...erall, less adults are interacting with less children. Family sizes decrease as peop...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05464480874 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59982404649 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568306010929 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9033873784 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353316384385 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1104549375 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810809705019 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22388831884 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311050232678 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.