Some people believe that the Internet has reduced the need for studying facts in history and science.
Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your knowledge or experience.
Without a shadow of a doubt, with afoot progression and augmentation in societies, human beings are struggling with miscellaneous upheaval-causing issues. One of which is nothing but the internet. Some are of the opinion that the internet has begotten we do not try to improve our edification on history and science. My standpoint is clear: I do not go for such credence. In the following, I declare my notions succinctly.
Needless to say that our cultural history is an integral part of our life. It seems that by dint of the internet, all persons can access and download historical books or even share their treasuries with others. In this way, should we face historical information, we can swiftly investigate its veritable. Moreover, we can acquire a digitized on-line version of searchable books, intuitively making us much keener to know more about past events.
Furthermore, science is burgeoning exponentially. If a person desire to do credible research, the internet will be undoubtedly a boon. Accordingly, access to webpages will be an irrefutable desideratum nowadays. For instance, Dr. Boo, who is one of the trailblazers in the field of search-oriented data, avers that the research suggests the number of googling information related to the history and science is booming quotidian, i.e., the need of the internet for digging up the rectitude, whether for history or science, is effecting all zenith and nadirs of our life.
To briefly recapitulate, we can boil this essay down on two items: (1) I am deeply-believed that the internet is a gift, which is bestowed to our generation, (2) to find facts, for both aforementioned subjects, the feeling requisite of its usage has not declined but in contrast, has exorbitantly waxed.
- The first graph shows the reasons for studying in the UK by age, while the second graph shows the support given by employers for training by age. 100
- Some people think having more TV channels is good because they will have more choices While other people think too many TV channels only lead to a lot of poor quality TV programs Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and in 78
- The graph shows the number of minutes of three types of phone calls in Australia between 1992-2000.Summaries the information in the charts and make comparisons where appropriate. 100
- The first chart below shows then umber of airline crew pilots stewards etc needed to fly a passenger plane between Australia and a number of other countries The second chart shows the number of passenger complaints per plane journey made on these routes a 81
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant has been deleted 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, briefly, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16197183099 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25334582785 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62323943662 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.1943428249 49.4020404114 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161621379651 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492530030387 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526624854067 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09421926305 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549550501823 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.