The graph below shows the consumption and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979and 2004
The line graph compares the amount of fish, chicken, lamb, and beef people in a European country consumed weekly per person over 25 years.
Overall, it can be manifested the consumption of chicken grew over time while meats of different types were more preferred by people in the given European country than the fishes.
As maintained by the graph more than 200 grams of beef consumed daily by each person initially in 1979. In this year each person on average ate 150 grams of chicken and lambs while the consumption was just over 50 grams this year. Overtime people preferred chicken and the consumption kept on increasing and reached over 250 grams per day by an individual.
The intake of beef, lamb moderately decreased over time and finally, in 2004 the overage consumption of these two meat types decreased to around 100 grams per person in a day. The fish consumption remained stable throughout the year slightly decreased in 2004
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-28 | Horiya Modina | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | Patel roma | 73 | view |
- The table gives information on consumer on different items in five different countries in 2002 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television fridge do disadvantage of this development for society of outweigh 74
- The graph below shows the consumption and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979and 2004 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en European country than the fishes. As maintained by the graph more than 200 g...
^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these two meat types decreased to around 100 grams per person in a day. The fish ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.925 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52289516231 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7389177386 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166732568593 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084439490216 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489781297788 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115530434879 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442175051503 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.