Many criminals re-offend after they have been punished. Why do some people continue to commit crime s after they have been punished, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
Notwithstanding human beings are going through afoot progression and augmentation in societies and science, they still are struggling with miscellaneous upheaval-causing quandaries. One of which is nothing but the reoffending of the culprits. There exist some root causes leading to this issue, and some can be taken to obviate it. Here, both aforementioned inquiries will be discussed succinctly.
To re-commit a crime, some reasons can be demonstrated why it might occur. First and foremost, it might be said some offenders can be placed in the category of hardened criminals; accordingly, such persons are incorrigible towards rehabilitation programs and should be under surveillance. For instance, after the breakout of the pandemic, the judiciary of some countries had decided to release some criminals, but after awhile, some of them got down to repeating their ignominious deeds. Furthermore, with the exponential escalation of inflation and firing from career, some bandits do their crime several times even if they get back to the societies.
To address such breached issues, some ways have been proposed so far. Firstly, the incorrigible culpable persons should be exiled, or even government can exercise them as gratuitous workers in hard-work conditions, such as mining and construction of roads. In this way, they are not merely prolific for nations but also precluded from taking part in criminal activities. Moreover, as a deterrent way, should governments provide more jobs and disburse more bounces, incentives, subsidiaries, and perquisites so the blue-collar proletarian; in this sense, they eschew from doing guilty deeds once more intuitively.
To briefly recapitulate, apart from this matter that some matters bring about it, e.g., getting accustomed to crime and being impecunious or having fiscal problems, just by exiling and coercing for incorrigible people and by job creation, countries can dispose of re-offending.
- The bar chart shows the expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 di erent areas 57
- It is sometimes said that the countryside offers a high quality of life especially for families What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside for example as farmers What is your own view about this 78
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not e ective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons.Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 78
- Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: FOR_AWHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a while'?
Suggestion: a while
...ed to release some criminals, but after awhile, some of them got down to repeating the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, briefly, but, e.g., first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, while, apart from, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64965986395 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19674514288 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656462585034 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.2237909856 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.769230769 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303008577849 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962783955873 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568461950898 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161443202784 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411005656405 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.