The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph illustrates a comparison of a different kind of meat and fish which consume by European from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it can be manifested that the consumption of meat and fish decreased during the given period except for chicken.
To begin with, the consumption of beef was the highest in 1978 which was around 220 grammes per persona per week. But, then the consumption of this decreased gradually to near about 160 grammes in 1984 after this it experiences a slow increase in 1989 than it falls dramatically to just above 100 grammes in 2004. Moreover, consumption of fish was the lowest and stable during the whole given period which was about 50 grammes.
However, although the meat of chicken and lamb had the same popularity in the initial year which was around 150 grammes per person per week, these both experience opposite trend from each other. Consumption of chicken was increase with time and reach a high of around 250 grammes per person per week.in 2004. Whereas, the consumption of lamb was a decrease with time and reach around 80 grammes per person per week with some fluctuation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-21 | Guri473812 | view | |
| 2021-01-01 | sagarparmar | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | pparth777 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | RAHMAYANI | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | fadhiahelbas | 73 | view |
- People have long imagined the possibility that life exist on other planets Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside of Earth What would be the implications of proving that alien life exist 56
- In my parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crime why is it happening how should children or teachers be punished 56
- People have long imagined the possibility that life exists on other planets Do you believe that there is life in the universe outside of earth What would be the implications of proving that alien life exists 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- An increasing number of people are now using dating sites to meet their partners Do you think this tendency helps people or does it do more harm 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...ally to just above 100 grammes in 2004. moreover, consumption of fish was the lowest and...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, except for, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83854166667 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53452184805 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536458333333 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3327012482 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178406433155 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104782336883 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124667414678 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171139326108 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148788875938 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.