Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very less about famous people from the history in their own country. Why is this? How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their own famous people from history?
Many people argue that is disappointing when students are knowledgeable about celebrities and entertaining products but know nothing about history people. In my opinion, this tendency comes from inappropriate history lessons at schools and can be solved with the coordination of music or film producers.
Stories of history characters have become unattractive to students mostly because they have been not taught correctly at schools. For example, in Vietnam, history lectures only summarize battles and briefly mention few outstanding leaders of the combats in short sentences to help students easily memorize to pass the exams. The personal backgrounds of characters and the history contexts motivating characters to fight are ignored as the teachers do have enough time to talk about. As a result, students cannot see the relation between characters and themselves, between the past and the present. Therefore, students gradually lose their interest in great people in history and stop reading about these people.
Bringing history characters into TV screens or music products is the most effective way to encourage students to learn more about the past people. First, directors and producers can make films about history characters so that students can passively learn history through entertaining. For example, when watching films of royal family fights for the power, students can question about characters if their actions are right or wrong. Second, if stories of royal families are portrayed in a music video, they will draw a tremendous attention of students on history. Students may have to read a lot of the characters-related information to increase their knowledge to discuss the videos with friends.
In conclusion, the curriculum at schools is the main culprit to make students find the history people unattractive. Therefore, history characters should be more strongly depicted on music videos or films so that students can learn about history easily when entertaining.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-07 | Hanachan123456789 | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-10 | rk_93 | 73 | view |
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can be able to make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with 73
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and this may result in an increase in the use of cars Do 78
- In many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in short, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53114754098 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92431447646 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.7620139796 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.5 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22476233203 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092216276292 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797679291359 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170492832266 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529264602762 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.