1 The graph below shows the percentage of workers in 5 different European countries with a day or more illness absence from 1991 to 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

1. The graph below shows the percentage of workers in 5 different European countries with a day or more illness absence from 1991 to 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given graph illustrates the fraction absence of employees in the countries like Netherland, Sweden, France, Italy and Germany over the period from 1991 to 2001.

Overall, In country, Netherland and Sweden marked the highest absence of the workers; however, as mentioned, France and Italy has the median absence. In contrast, Germany has the least absence over a decade. Over the span, there was no considerable change marked up as per the figure.

In the initial half decade, the absence of employees in Netherland and Sweden dipped to half and found to be 32 and 20 percent from 48 and 40 percent respectively. Despite of that no change were noticed in France, Italy and Germany over the period and found to be 25, 20 and 12 percent respectively.

For the rest half decade, the absence of employees went rise in Netherland and Sweden where it touched the same level (48 percent) for Netherland as was in 1991 and in Sweden it crossed the level and stood at 45%. Moreover, France, Italy and Germany did not experience any big change and was immunized at 25, 20 and 12 percent levels.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-12 Piyush Somani 64 view
2021-01-12 Piyush Somani 78 view
Essays by user Piyush Somani :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence any big change and was immunized at 25, 20 and 12 percent levels.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80423280423 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57710523716 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470899470899 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5778917513 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0807379305923 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412653836656 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504150644338 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667680537494 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558564333806 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence any big change and was immunized at 25, 20 and 12 percent levels.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80423280423 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57710523716 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470899470899 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5778917513 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0807379305923 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412653836656 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504150644338 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667680537494 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558564333806 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.