Fossil fuels (cool, oil, natural gas) are the main source of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative source of energy (wind energy and solar energy) are encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is irrefutable that fossil fuels have been an major source of energy in many part of the world, but some nation are taking a step forward and using alternative energy like solar, wind and tidal. Definitely, it is a positive development. A number of arguments surround my opinion.
On the one hand, the major advantage of using alternative resources is that conventional sources like oil, natural gas or coal are non-renewable. They take millions of years to make and we are depleting them at an alarming rate. This means that if we finish an existing resource then they all will be gone forever as far as our generation and coming generations are concerned. Energy from the sun, wind and sea is an everlasting source of power that might guarantee the boundless supply of energy for continuously increasing population. In addition, some countries that do not have natural fossil materials can decline the dependences on fuels from others. For instance, large number of homeless residents in European nation died during the winter due to the lack of energy for heating while Russian government imposed the energy sanction to close the oil pipeline from Russia to Europe. On the other hand, another big advantage of using alternative energy is that they do not pollute the environment. We all know that global warming and damage to protective ozone layer all caused due to carbon-dioxide and other by-products of fossil fuels. If urgent action are not taken towards the use of natural sources like sun, wind then time is not so far when the whole earth will be transform into the boiling pot.
Although the use of these alternative sources has some hurdles such as initial cost of setting up solar panels and wind power is also expensive during the initial stage and these also depend on geographical locations. However, once their initial cost is met, their maintenance is practically negligible.
To conclude, the use of non-conventional sources of energy has many positive implications. It should be a global priority to invest in such research and development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-13 | sandhyasharma198 | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-13 | sandhyasharma198 | 67 | view |
- Fossil fuels cool oil natural gas are the main source of energy in many countries but in some countries the use of alternative source of energy wind energy and solar energy are encouraged To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative developmen 67
- Some people believe that everyone has right to university education Therefore government should make university education free for everyone no matter what their financial background is To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- 1 Do you agree that the advantages cars bring outweigh the disadvantages 76
- Fossil fuels cool oil natural gas are the main source of energy in many countries but in some countries the use of alternative source of energy wind energy and solar energy are encouraged To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative developmen 67
- 1 The first graph below shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013 and also the amount in tonnes of fertiliser used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month in millimetres Write a report summarising 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...irrefutable that fossil fuels have been an major source of energy in many part of ...
^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun part seems to be countable; consider using: 'many parts'.
Suggestion: many parts
... have been an major source of energy in many part of the world, but some nation are takin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01744186047 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83970415472 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549418604651 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7930047139 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384248019684 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111398658445 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11170145435 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225228551918 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952399210582 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.