The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram given compares the proportion of money donated by British in terms of different age group in 2 separate year 1990 and 2020.
Overall, in 1990 and 2020, the people in 36 - 50 years old group and 51 -65 years old spent higher amount of money on charity in comparison to the other groups. It is also clear that people from 18 to 50 spent less money on this work in 2010 than in 1990.
It can be observed that while in 1990, there was approximately 17% of the British giving money to charity, the figure in 2010 for this age group decreased significantly to 7%. The proportion of the British from 26 to 35 donated was a little more than 30% in 1990, then fell to 24% in 2010. The people in 36-50 years old group witnessed the highest proportion of participants that was more than 40% in 1990. However, this figure decreased to 35% in 2010.
When it comes to two other age groups, 51-65 years old group and the British being older than 65 both expanded the proportion of participants for charity purpose. There was 40% of 51 to 65 years old group donating in 1990 before it rose to nearly 40% in 2010. In terms of the people getting older than 65, the figure in 1990 and 2010 were 33% and 35% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | view | |
| 2023-01-23 | Nicole Yu | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-19 | Punm | 56 | view |
- the pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 56
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35964912281 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36880948296 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464912280702 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9633602369 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221595839193 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104755597302 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438255682766 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152715732349 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202914177447 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.39 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.