Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now ‘one big traffic jam.’
How true do you think this statement is? What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
In todays modern world, there has been an increase in the number of private cars for more than 30 years that leads many cities suffering from serious traffic jam. The governments should adopt some measurements to tackle this problem.
Honestly, there are some convincing reasons why people prefer owing private cars. First of all, having your own car can do wonders for your lifestyle. It means that you can save time if you drive by yourselves. One more reason for this problem is the low quality of public transport service that makes the public gravitate to buy own vehicles, including car. However, rising the number of private cars has a direct relationship with traffic jams. In the peak hour, the flow of private cars accompanied by poor road infrastructure is the main reasons for congestions. For example, in Hanoi capital of Vietnam, it is easy for the public to be struck in high concentration of a congestion.
I believe that the policy makers should adopt some practical measurements to deal with this issue. The first method is imposing high taxes on car buyers. This method can boost the car price higher that exerts significant impacts on demanding of customers. For example, there are some special kind of taxes such as VAT which influences the purchasing decision-making process of buyers leading to the decrease in the number of private cars. Moreover, local authorities should implement road maintainances and public transportation frequently to adapt the high level of transport flow. Expanding roads, adequate traffic lights systems and opening more bus lines can be effective solutions for this situation,
In conclusion, in many countries, traffic jam is an urgent problem as the result of rising the number of private cars. I believe that governments should implement suitable measures to overcome this issue.
- The chat below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2015 and future projection of 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- The Chart Below Shows What Anthropology Graduates From One University Did After Finishing Their Undergraduate Degree Course 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food it is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food to what extent do you agree or disagree with 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...rs. For example, there are some special kind of taxes such as VAT which influences t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, honestly, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78623621925 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4026425786 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3125 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212560532138 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726584950826 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524158879665 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149737644054 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574206069783 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.