Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a question about which organizations should expense money on supporting talented artists. While some argue that it should be the responsibility of the government, I believe that these creators could find other financial sources.
On the one hand, I consider that some art projects undoubtedly require financial assistance from the authority. In fact, some public artworks not only help create distinctive characteristics but also represent the identity, culture, and history of the nation. They serve to educate people about the city and act as landmarks that can attract millions of tourists annually. Therefore, with the enormous funding from the government, artists could unleash their creativity without worrying about financial issues and create mind-blowing designs.
On the other hand, I concur with some advocates that creative artists should find other assistance for funding art. First, the spending priorities in the government’s budget should be public infrastructures and human capital development. According to recent reports, higher investments in these sectors could support economic growth as well as prepare a competent workforce in the future. Moreover, artists can find other sources of funding instead of relying on government support. For example, they can sell their artworks or get donations from art lovers to pay for living expenses or invest in the following art projects. Last but not least, the community also should be responsible for advertising these domestic products. As a result, they support the creators, both mentally and physically.
In conclusion, I am firmly convinced that not only the government but also other organizations or even the community could give funding to talented artists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | killashaw | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | oyinmartha | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Friezzy | 84 | view |
- New parents should attend parenting courses to learn how to bring up their children well To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In order to be successful in sport some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 83
- Some people think that the development of technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them Education and training are better To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people are of the opinion that women should play an equal role in police or military forces like the army Others believe that this work is unsuitable for women Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...issues and create mind-blowing designs. On the other hand, I concur with some ad...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61363636364 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97347278515 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.189433722 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295460967086 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972399241307 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755731107801 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164093554376 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516065656538 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.