All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks.
Parks are most important in retaining the biodiversity of city. So it’s our generic duty to preserve them. Maintaining vegetation’s health is indirectly increasing lifespan of human. Recently various metropolitan organisation fix a specific amount of yearly budget against the preserving of park in their city. Preserving the park fauna and flora boost the overall lifespan of city’s population.
Parks are most important for elderly people and children. As it sooths their mental and physical health. There is also increase in socialisation of people during early hours of morning. Mayor of particular city should take responsibility of protecting parks from weeds, unwanted trees, various flower puckers disturbing the overall flora and fauna of the parks, Special portion of budget should be reserve for parks futuristic development and preserving its beauty. There should be at least one park per 1000 people in the city. It’s our responsibility to protect our nature’s beauty and its blessing.
But nowadays due to overdosing schooling works, corporate stresses and various factors are affecting presence of humans in park. So it should be drawn to mayor for organising various programmes regarding maintenance and preserving of parks. Because park are those which soothes individual’s mind and remove various toxicity from one’s body. There should be special allotment of plot by city council in remote or outskirt for developing deep feeling regarding parks flora and fauna.
By devoting special budget for parks also improve feeling regarding environment and our fundamental duty regarding nature’s health and its preserve. Schools should also take part in empowering this thought by organising special session in parks and tree plantation event. There should also be various shops aside the park that boost ups city’s overall economic flow. Mayor should take responsibility of maintaining parks annually. Various Yoga session should be held in park and also make sure that most people should join them which overall increases health average per person in particular city which is good for city’s per head lifespan.
Thus, administration Panel of city council should always devote specific portion of their annual budget for preserving parks and its flora and fauna. That’s make the overall city’s population salubrious
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | BusariMoruf | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | sheryl dsouza | 50 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | June_1108 | 66 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | rishitha981@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2021-04-17 | ulligadda sreeja | 58 | view |
- All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- All cities should devote at least five percent of their budgets to programs that preserve and protect existing parks 66
- A recent study rating 100 college football players showed a strong relationship between their average number of colds caught per year and their teams’ records. Of the players studied, those who had the fewest colds had teams with win/loss ratios that we 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reserved'?
Suggestion: reserved
...ks, Special portion of budget should be reserve for parks futuristic development and pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the overall city’s population salubrious
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, thus, at least, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62011173184 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79977461005 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5977287127 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4545454545 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.90909090909 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298378611478 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951649180124 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662535415824 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199384568074 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505571095924 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.