Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.
There is a hot debate over whether the government should make decision based on the public's sound or on their own judgement. Nowadays, the preference to live in a democratic society rather than an autocratic one is an obvious proof that we hope the leader can stand together with us. However, in my point of view, it is not reliable to adhere to trend of the public all the time.
No one will doubt the importance of the government to be representative of the wills of the public. It is also the reason why we vote to elect our leader by comparing their policies and thoughts. For instance, the government of Argentina just made abortion legal recently. For the catholic world, it is a shock as well as a breakthrough. If the government had not respond to wide call from most of the woman and chosen to remain strict regulation over abortion, there would be nonstop suffering from infection and death caused by illegal abortion.
However, it could be risky if government officials make all decisions following the public's will. In certain issues which are complex and debatable, involving careful evaluation by experts from a more comprehensive aspect may lead to a better decision. For example, a group of people strongly proposed to the government of building a highway through the mountain and deep into the community located in remote countryside in Taiwan several years ago. However, there are other inhabitants who argued that this would be devastation to their homeland before any economic growth happens. In this situation, if government had listened to either side of the opinion, it would be injustice and risky. They finally decide to build a substitute highway based on their judgement, forming through discussions with economic and environmental experts.
In the final analysis, there should be no definite answer to whether they listen to the public or decide on their own will bring the greatest benefit to the whole society since every issue faced is independent. Yet, it is for sure that taking only either approach seems to be an incomprehensive behavior of a leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-23 | zanzendegi | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | rockchisom | 79 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | Sumit68 | 83 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 66 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | pfftahsan | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview It is time for the city of Grandview to stop funding the Grandview Symphony Orchestra It is true that the symphony struggled financially for many years but last year private 78
- The Mozart School of Music should be the first choice for parents considering enrolling their child in music lessons First of all the Mozart School welcomes youngsters at all ability and age levels there is no audition to attend the school Second the scho 50
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 58
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Relannian newspaper Industry analysts report that the number of dairy farms in Relanna has increasedby 25 percent over the last decade Also recent innovations in milking technology make it possible for 65
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'responded'.
Suggestion: responded
...breakthrough. If the government had not respond to wide call from most of the woman and...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and death caused by illegal abortion. However, it could be risky if government...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80490660726 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3145274571 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199612509319 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598791508019 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616304974963 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11208518143 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324043601726 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'responded'.
Suggestion: responded
...breakthrough. If the government had not respond to wide call from most of the woman and...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and death caused by illegal abortion. However, it could be risky if government...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80490660726 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3145274571 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199612509319 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598791508019 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616304974963 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11208518143 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324043601726 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.