The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities

Essay topics:

The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

The given maps represent the constructional changes of several tourist facilities on an island.
It shows the overall island what it was before and after the construction.

Significantly, before there’s just sand and trees but after construction, more houses or cottages are built for accommodation and it is organized in the form of a circle by a footpath connecting all the cottages. Another set of cottages connecting the reception by a footpath around some palm trees. That reception is situated in the center of the island where they receive the tourists, assign their booked cottages, and assist them throughout their visit surrounded by a vehicle track. A restaurant is built by the sea and it’s right in the back of the reception.

A T-shaped pier is put on the sea bed to welcome the tourists reached on boats. By the beach, so many different activities are held over and a place for swimming. The whole deserted island is a tourist attraction after the construction of facilities.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-07 ThHuong 78 view
2024-07-30 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 98, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ists reached on boats. By the beach, so many different activities are held over and a place fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04819277108 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01192770843 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620481927711 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5216625501 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322706003637 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122634908476 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131817171512 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219287395615 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113620647849 0.0819641961636 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.