Travelling to other plants has become a reality for many individuals thanks to technology. Therefore, many masses claim that space travel can lead to success for upcoming generation. However, I think that this given ideas could not be completely supported because the funding it needs.
To begin with, there are two prime reasons to agree with above mentioned view. One of them is research on finding natural resources on other plants which are required to sustainable human existence. This is due to the fact that fossil fuels such as coal, water and oil are running out rapidly cause of overuse. Though it can be said that this unexpected utilisation of these sources may put makind's life on risk. For instance, from past travels to space it was claimed by astronauts that probably there are some other sphere where natural resources are available.
Another possible cause why space research is worth to do can be way of taking a next step towards advance technology. To elaborate, many innovations have proved that travelling to space is not useless. For instance, invention of internet and satellites are two prime advancements which have human life easy and this credits goes to none other than space exploration.
Conversely, an opposite argument is huge amount of money that government has to allocate on space travel. If governing bodies do so, there will be scarcity of revenue to spend on other urgent issues namely health care and education. That is why, an acceptable remedy must be distribution of expenses among countries all over the globe.
To sum up, It seems that space research does not serve any specific country or person but whole universe, so every nation ought to give assistance for such research.
- Some people think they have right to use as much freshwater as they want Others believe governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is limited resource Discuss both views and give your option 84
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 95
- Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialise with people in their local communities Do you think it s has more advantages or disadvantages 89
- It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith above mentioned view. One of them is research on finding natural resources on...
^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e running out rapidly cause of overuse. Though it can be said that this unexpected uti...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'spheres'?
Suggestion: spheres
...auts that probably there are some other sphere where natural resources are available. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, may, so, therefore, as to, for instance, i think, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04529616725 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61393254481 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648083623693 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4491125665 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216270223209 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067851000409 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498679460166 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113413086391 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412218350878 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.