For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of selling products has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “does it depend more on the company’s reputation or if they provide any discount and free offers?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that both reputation and discount are important factors, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, branding is bound up inextricably with marketing, which indicates they lead to both high revenue and prosperity. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between advertising and affluent lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in potential customers. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of significant influence is correlated positively with not only globalization but also far-reaching subsidiaries.
Within the realm of sales policies, without the slightest doubt, a discount scheme attribute to tempting offers, in that it would come down to advertisement, comparative advantages, and better sales. A salient example of such attribution is commercial agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of positive dimensions of seasonal sales.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that both reputation and free offers are highly beneficial. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
- Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food do you like this way 85
- For a successful company selling products depends more on company s reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 55
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write but those who cannot learn unlearn and relearn Agree or Disagree 88
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university which one do you agree is more effective 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74394463668 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24288102517 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695501730104 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8607824954 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198815278279 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524521296898 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101116884357 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120117290709 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12128594991 0.0609392437508 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.