While international car-free days are thought to be a productive solution in diminishing air pollution, others believe that there are some other paths to deal with air contamination. Personally, I find both views have their own prospects
To begin with, car exhaust is indeed the biggest contributor to air pollution. Therefore, if people use other means of transports such as a bicycle instead of a personal car during some definite days, not only the human’s living operation will not be critically interrupted but also the emissions will considerably be reduced. Furthermore, if global car-free days are organized, people’s awareness of using environmentally friendly vehicles will be boosted.
On the other hand, car usage is not the only factor that causes polluted air. As a result, there are some different ways to solve this serious problem. Firstly, people or factories can use some kind of alternative resources for operating vehicles such as wind or solar energy to get rid of some fundamental air pollutants (coal and petrol). Secondly, the governments of every country should release more strict policies about the ways that companies use fossil fuel and treat the air pollutants before discharging them into the atmosphere. Finally, we should do better education on protecting our environment, especially atmosphere problem because of our better respiration as well as our existence.
In my opinion, the effectiveness of international car-free days is undeniable, however, I extremely believe that humans should take more essential action to protect their natural habitat in parallel with protecting their survival.
To conclude, there is a range of ways to diminish air pollution, and humans play an important role in effectuating these solutions.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 10
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 73
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period 79
- In school and universities girls tend to choose art while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...find both views have their own prospects To begin with, car exhaust is indeed the...
^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pollutants'' or 'pollutant's'?
Suggestion: pollutants'; pollutant's
...ergy to get rid of some fundamental air pollutants coal and petrol. Secondly, the governme...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46350364964 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08341463126 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0439062398 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.090909091 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.0 7.06120827912 255% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302525085865 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10630345627 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449668668874 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148518102209 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273169215947 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...find both views have their own prospects To begin with, car exhaust is indeed the...
^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pollutants'' or 'pollutant's'?
Suggestion: pollutants'; pollutant's
...ergy to get rid of some fundamental air pollutants coal and petrol. Secondly, the governme...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46350364964 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08341463126 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0439062398 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.090909091 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.0 7.06120827912 255% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302525085865 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10630345627 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449668668874 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148518102209 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273169215947 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.