The given bar chart highlights data about how many people who visited Met in New York, Edo in Tokyo and China's National museum over a five-year period between 2000 and 2005.
Overall, it can be seen in this graph that museums had fewer visitors on average in the first half of the period compared to the second one. Another interesting point is that National museum of China had the lowest level of visitors, and Edo-Tokyo had the highest number at the beginning of the period, but they exchanged their positives at the end of the time period.
Looking at the details, Edo-Tokyo was visited by more than 13 millions people in 2000, and that was the highest point at that time. Met had slightly fewer visitors at 12 millions, while National museum of China experienced about twice lower figure in that year. Towards the end of the first half the period only China's National museum showed upward trend whereas others saw downward trends.
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 91
- The chart below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six science related subjects at a UK university in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- In many countries students attend private cram schools for extra coaching in test taking techniques What is your view of this practice 56
- The diagram below shows how raw materials are used to make plastic products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... China had the lowest level of visitors, and Edo-Tokyo had the highest number at ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77914110429 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2321173466 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.1912358943 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113901339102 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612725182884 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253480764765 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840326669314 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00962497112227 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.