The bar chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The bar chart depicts information about the amount of money spent on computers, cars, books, perfumes and cameras in France and the United Kingdom in 2010.
Overall, the emerging fact from the chart is that the UK spent more money on consumer goods than France. Both regions spent most of their income on cars, the proportion of expenditure on perfumes was less in the UK compared to cameras in France.
Looking in more details in the car, the residents of the United Kingdom spent about £450,000 however, the figure in France was £ 400,000. Similarly, the British expenses higher on the book than the French around £ 400,000 and £ 300,000 respectively. In the UK, spending on cameras just over £350,000 was over double than France, which was only 150,000.
On the other hand, the proportion of money spent on the remaining goods was larger in France. Likewise, above £350,000 invest by French on a computer which was slightly higher than Britishers who pays exactly 350,000. with regards to, neither nations invest their income on perfumes, which accounted for £200,000 in France but under £150,000 in the united kingdom.
- The table shows the percentage of spending in five countries in three product groups 92
- Reducing working hours is an effective solution to reduce employment 73
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people while others say that technology has the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The first graph shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by the farm each month in 2013 and also almost in tonnes of fertilizer used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month 84
- The graph shows internet usage in three countries between 1999 and 2009
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£400'.
Suggestion: £400
...0,000 however, the figure in France was £ 400,000. Similarly, the British expenses hi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£400'.
Suggestion: £400
...gher on the book than the French around £ 400,000 and £ 300,000 respectively. In the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£300'.
Suggestion: £300
...ok than the French around £ 400,000 and £ 300,000 respectively. In the UK, spending o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...an Britishers who pays exactly 350,000. with regards to, neither nations invest thei...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, likewise, look, similarly, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03174603175 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45360066242 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544973544974 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.9231397686 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0784114043881 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422618426789 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572068786634 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069115050363 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596059236008 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.