Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
By and large, it is beyond doubt that education is an integral part of society as it opens the door to school while closing a door to crime. In this regard, getting knowledge from teachers is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars whether teachers are obtaining more respect today or they were appreciated more in the past. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the notion that teachers had more value in past by disagreeing with the statement. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my idea is that teachers were the only approachable source of education in the past. It is notable that in this contemporary world, technology has advanced to such a level that it has eased access to information. People have internet facilities which can draw unlimited resources of education. For instance, educational videos, homework websites, learning activities, and electronic books. It is worth mentioning that such exceptional ways were not available in the past to facilitate students. The only source was teachers who were responsible not only for strenuously teaching pupils but also for their personality development. The relationships between a guide and a learner were immensely strong and vividly, they were considered the backbone of society. By way of illustration, 40 years ago, when my mother was in high school, she did not has books to study. The only way she and other students of the society could get an education was through teachers. Therefore, teachers were highly appreciated and had huge respect among people. They were being invited as a chief guest in all events of society. This clearly explains my point.
The second exquisite rationale behind my belief is rooted in the fact that there were few teachers in the past as compared to nowadays. It is crystal clear that with the dawn of modernization, the overall population of the world has also increased. With this change, more people are prone to excel in getting knowledge, and experts of various fields have also advanced. Whereas, in the past due to low population, there were few teachers because there was not much awareness for learning. People preferred labor and skilled work as compare to going to school. Thus, the value of few teachers in society was profound. As a case in mind, my mother had only one teacher in her town when she was a child. This manifests my point.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer although educators are in high demand, they were highly valued in the earlier period. For the sake of brevity, a couple of reasons are worth reiterating: first, teachers were the only source of education, secondly, they were not a lot. As a writer, I vehemently urge people to respect their teachers because they deserve it. By doing so, society will prosper.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ppreciated more in the past. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the notion that...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 887, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... mother was in high school, she did not has books to study. The only way she and ot...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, as for, for instance, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2420.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98969072165 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77113402062 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3226628382 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4482758621 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.724137931 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8275862069 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295552096071 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766200858302 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690219706069 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202532422054 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403197394428 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.