Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the face of environmental pollution and climate change, there has been an urgent demand for a new sustainable source of energy. And nuclear energy has been suggested as one of the most reliable sources to take into consideration. Nevertheless, in my point of view, I am strongly opposed to the idea of implementing nuclear energy into our daily life due to its infeasibility along with the potential risks it may bring.
At the outset, the highly sophisticated nuclear power plant is highly likely to make both the government and investors less inclined in investing and developing nuclear energy. Initially, there is no denying that the process of constructing a new power plant can discourage people from putting all time and resources into building it. Not only does this project require multi-billion dollar infrastructure but it is also involved in the complicated and difficult procedure of licensing and regulation approvals. Besides, in all likelihood, investors will find it challenging to recruit highly professional and experienced workers in order to meet a strict requirement of plant construction. Secondly, the extremely prohibitive cost of operation owing to regulations including maintenance, staff levels, training throughout the year will make it nearly impossible for many governments to afford and continue this project.
Furthermore, nuclear energy is also likely to pose potentially dangerous threats to both the environment and human beings. It can easily be seen that local thermal pollution from waste water will definitely exert a negative impact on marine life which has been seriously affected by other sources of energy. Moreover, the lack of experience in managing and operating safely a nuclear plant may result in malfunction of these plants, and catastrophic accidents. This has been proven to leave a life-long impact on people’s health, destroy the ecosystem in certain areas as well as put the energy industry into turmoil.
To conclude, I strongly disagree that humans should opt for nuclear energy for a sustainable and environmentally friendly source of energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
- In the future, students will have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television of studying at traditional schools. What would you prefer? 84
- Libraries should focus on improving their technological resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The importance of fresh water to life and offer your own solutions to preserve this very valuable natural resource. 89
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 78
- One way to solve the problem of congestion on the roads is to increase the tax on private vehicles. How could this alleviate congestion? What other measures can you suggest to deal with congestion in cities? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 577, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'recruiting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: recruiting
...ood, investors will find it challenging to recruit highly professional and experienced wor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onmentally friendly source of energy.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45731707317 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12816169625 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606707317073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.0428706912 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.692307692 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145291241322 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533360828781 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051189275628 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107952153853 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581933883896 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.