The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four different types of secondary schools between 2000 and 2009.
The table gives information about the attendance figures for four types of secondary schools in three different years.
Overall, it is evident that the specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled schools experienced declines in the number of pupils, whereas the opposite pattern could be observed at community schools making them the most pop3 in terms of attendance levels in the year 2009.
Turning to the details, the proportion of pupils in voluntary-controlled schools fell from just over a half to only 20% from 2000 to 2009. Similarly, the relative number of children in grammar schools which was 24% also dropped by a half in the same period. As for the specialist schools, the relatively small percentage of pupils attended this type of schools, also decreased, although not significantly.
However, while the other three types of schools declined in popularity, the opposite was true in the case of community schools. In fact, while only a small minority of 12% were educated in these schools in 2000, this figure had increased to well over a half of all pupils by the end of the period.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 100
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 30
- Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is a major problem What are the causes of this How can this problem be solved 61
- Overpopulation in many major urban centers around the world is a major problem What are the causes of this How can this problem be solved 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ools in three different years. Overall, it is evident that the specialist, gram...
^^
Line 2, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all, it is evident that the specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled schools...
^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the year 2009. Turning to the details, the proportion of pupils in voluntary-co...
^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o only 20% from 2000 to 2009. Similarly, the relative number of children in gramm...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... period. As for the specialist schools, the relatively small percentage of pupil...
^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of pupils attended this type of schools, also decreased, although not significan...
^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d this type of schools, also decreased, although not significantly. However, ...
^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... although not significantly. However, while the other three types of schools d...
^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...types of schools declined in popularity, the opposite was true in the case of com...
^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the case of community schools. In fact, while only a small minority of 12% were ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, as for, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08839779006 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0785728144 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6810756454 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2857142857 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326063638963 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141443136627 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963559655625 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198383845956 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956131656593 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.