Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Life of humans change every day because of the advancements in the technology and automation, our life has become more compact than of our ancestors. Hence, a reasonable person might think people should not make decisions based on the past. However, the past helps us to make educated decisions in the present. People might make better choices today by retrospecting on the past. The past helps mankind to understand their progress in the present.
History aids us to understand what we are today and how much progress we have made. Past helps individuals to make better decisions than those made in the past. We could look back in history, we could look back on the world wars, and can understand the roots. These world wars had made a tremendous amount of damage to the world population. There was nothing positive about these wars, no one would ever want these wars to happen again. Thus leaders of nations can look at these wars and can understand what mistakes lead to these brutal wars. They can avoid such mistakes in the future to mitigate the probability of another world war in the future.
Similarly, Governments around the globe can retrospect upon the previous administrations and understand the decisions that caused disastrous consequences. Decisions and policies that mitigated the development and could not serve the nation to their fullest. Governments can analyze such policies and decisions extensively and that can avoid such consequences and make educated decisions to make the future of the country better.
The world of business is greatly dependent on data from the past. A business can not survive if it does not get finer than it was in the past. The past decisions and data help businesses to make healthier choices. Today, new professions called data analytics and business analytics help businesses to understand their past mistakes by analyzing the past data of that business. The majority of businesses keep the past data and carefully analyze them to understand the past trends of the markets and to understand the areas where they could have done better. Hence, the majority of businesses make important decisions with the help of past decisions and their consequences.
However, can the past help individuals to make important decisions? If we look back to the lives of our ancestors, there were many traditions, rituals, and customs. Many are forgotten today because of the drastic changes in our lives. In such situations, one can not depend on the past to make future decisions. However, we can look back on the lives of our ancestors and we can understand how much progress we have made in our lives. By looking back in the past an individual can understand how much change they have made and how much progress they can make in the future. By keeping the history in the context, individuals may understand what decisions they should make to avoid consequences in the future.
To sum up, knowing our history helps us to understand our past mistakes and helps us to make educated decisions towards the future. Our history is the base of our present and one can not avoid it. Without knowing the past it is impossible to understand the true meaning of the present and the goals of the future. If one is making decisions without retrospecting on the past, they might be avoiding the history and thus, Micheal Crichton once said, "If you don't know the past, then you don't know anything. You are a leaf that does not know it is a part of the tree."
- Students today can access information online so libraries are not necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man 55
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today 58
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today 50
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather and lo 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...d ever want these wars to happen again. Thus leaders of nations can look at these wa...
^^^^
Line 14, column 463, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...icheal Crichton once said, 'If you dont know the past, then you dont know anyth...
^^^^
Line 14, column 492, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...pos;If you dont know the past, then you dont know anything. You are a leaf that doe...
^^^^
Line 14, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., then you dont know anything. You are a leaf that does not know it is a part of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, then, thus, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 98.0 58.6224719101 167% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2923.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 594.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92087542088 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93681225224 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67203327369 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.361952861953 0.4932671777 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 904.5 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2664690484 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5757575758 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0303030303 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.97078651685 181% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355689041403 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118679142622 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115936145565 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18902204392 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876697742018 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.