The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The given bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on consumer goods in two different countries in 2010. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the UK's expenditure on cars, books and cameras was higher than France, while France spent more money on computers and perfume.
According to the chart, it is vividly shown that people in the UK spent 50,000 pounds more than France’s expenditure on cars. Moreover, in camera expenditure the UK spent almost twice as much with just about 350,000 pounds in the UK compared with 150,000 pounds in France. Regarding books, in 2010, there was a trend for books and the UK's expenditure for them was almost 100,000 pounds more than in France.
By contrast, in consumer goods such as computers and perfume France spent slightly more than the UK's expenditure. More precisely, France’s expenditure for computers was nearly 370,000 compared to 350,000 in the UK, and the difference for perfume was around 70,000 pounds compared with the UK.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the number of visitors to four museums in the city Carlsburg over 10 years from 1995 to 2004 80
- A large number of unmarried youngsters now live on their own in cities away from their hometowns What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 96
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., France’s expenditure for computers was nearly 370,000 compared to 350,000 in th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0243902439 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54939308778 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.990644435 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1637814452 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109141954565 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118178794945 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138377641353 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835861408275 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.