Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It has been stated that although flocks of foreign travelers can commonly be seen at museums and historical sites, the opposite is the case for local visitors. From a personal perspective, visiting museums or historical places plays a more crucial part in the quality of the trip of international visitors than that of domestic ones. Despite being not over-excited that these places, local citizens can be drawn attention by advertising campaigns undertaken by ambassadors of museums.
The first aspect to consider regarding the most interesting features of these places to foreigners concerns the meaning of their trips. It can be seen that as for international tourists, traveling to another country is not only about enjoying its cuisine, custom, or sightseeings but it is also about enjoying that country’s past and present. Therefore, in order to explore and experience the country’s history, museums or historical sites resemble the best choice, in which they can also purchase symbolic gifts of the country for their friends. In contrast, with regard to the local population, learning domestic history since they were young makes them get bored and too familiar with these places. As a consequence, there is no more motivation which can encourage them to discover and have more acknowledge about museums or even historical sites.
To solve this problem, a method which is worth a try pursuing is proceeding advertising campaigns to seize native population’s attention. It is notable that due to being taught theoretically, most people recognize history as an uninteresting major. Thus, learning something new out of books can turn this subject into more attractive by discovering practical and observing acknowledgement. To make it real, social-events, such as attending plays or competitions, should be organized at these places by the cooperation among schools, museums and historical sites. Furthermore, museums can operate marketing or advertisements with appealing content about their events or promotions on social media as Facebook, Reddit or Instagram, which target at young people.
In conclusion, without memorial places, international visitor’s trips will be meaningless since they cannot reach the country’s history. In addition, more energy activities or campaigns should be held in order to encourage more local citizens to visit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | thaotanya | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-28 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
- Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves Some people think it is good while others think there are disadvantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, as for, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57340720222 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11720148238 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573407202216 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7528935742 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 134.133333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3119469696 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961863252155 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555313833296 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188284957657 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575206686546 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.