The bar chart compares the investment of five organizations in machinery, building, staff training, research.
It is clear that the organization B invested the most in all four sections while organization D and E had the least amount of money for investment.
In organization B, the most fund was spent for building at about 1.7 billion Euros which was followed by 1.6 billion for research. The amount of money used for staff training and machinery was 1.5 and 1.3 billion, respectively. There were 1 billion Euros funded for staff training while the money for building was just a half at 0.5 billion in organization A. Additionally, the figure for research and machinery was identical at 0.8 billion in this company.
Turning to organization D and E, the largest investment went to building with each devoting 1 billion Euros while three other categories ranging from 0.3 to 0.4 billion. At organization C, the money used for research and machinery was the same at 0.7 billion, whereas the figure for building and staff are lower, 0.5 and 0.4, respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01129943503 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95903921093 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536723163842 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4089401473 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210195406662 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12020024514 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929673946473 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183839821796 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794328404587 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.