The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided line graph represents the amount of carbon dioxide emissions, measured in metric tonnes, of 4 different categories, over 40 years, from 1967 until 2007.
Overall, it can be evidently observed that the UK and Sweden nations experienced a downward tendency, whereas Italy and Portugal had an upward trend.
In 1967, the amount of CO2 emissions in the United Kingdom and Sweden accounted for above 10 and 8 metric tonnes, respectively. Followed by a decade, the former group continued to decline, while the latter one reached a peak, which was lower slightly than the UK. However, it commenced plummeting significantly, subsequently, in 2007, plunged by 6 metric tonnes. Between 1977 and 2007, the UK’s amount dropped, afterward, had a nadir, approximately 9 tonnes.
Besides, Italy’s data was higher, around 3 metric tonnes than Portugal’s carbon dioxide, in 1967. After increasing, during the next 30 years, Italy’s information culminated, almost 8 tonnes, furthermore, another group climbed somewhat. Henceforth, the amount of CO2 emissions in Italy stagnated, but Portugal’s trend had a moderate improvement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-13 | Lily Ha | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | pr1nce | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Huwan Diamonds | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | anhminhbnvn1 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 84
- Some people say music is a good way of bringing people of different culture and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., had a nadir, approximately 9 tonnes. Besides, Italy’s data was higher, around...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61271676301 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07805503535 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699421965318 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0656604362 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199648653344 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818160346067 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474471139027 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115270263211 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326136231185 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.