The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this age of change, there has been much discussion revolving around the issue of whether nationals should stay at home with the Internet to travel around the world through a mobile, a computer, blogs, etc. In this essay, I will explain why going abroad to observe how people live and visit is more integral, compared with traveling by the Internet.
Visiting foreign countries with the Internet is responsible for a host of issues. The primary factor we need to take into the consideration is that people have a lack of connections with nature as well as the atmosphere in this place. To be more specific, each individual does not know more about the changes of native citizens since a range of websites do not offer information which was changed or felt into disuse. A perfect exemplification of this is that nowadays some places were moved to another but the maps were had yet to update, this problems conducive to misunderstand as well as confuse. In the second place, if you go to other parts of the world to travel, it will enhance your knowledge and lay the foundation for you to have more new relationships. In other words, people have more opportunities to make new national friends, meet large new people living in the entire world, and learn from them many new things.
On the other hand, some arguments can be made that meaningful travels through social media or the Internet being diverted to go to this place which people want to visit has several difficulties. Obviously, residents may pay more money on exploring modern nations as well as living expenses such as food, drinks, accommodations, and the like. However, prohibitively expensive associates with all of things which come in handy to develop themselves as well as raise a nation’s profile.
In conclusion, although coming abroad surely has a number of benefits, the Internet should not be ignored. As a consequence, I would assert that people should go to this country for their excursions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | phamquoctrung2007 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 67
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 540, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...er but the maps were had yet to update, this problems conducive to misunderstand as ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89552238806 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78882663874 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.0849017907 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191583241506 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663166970474 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454556774002 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107929550482 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355643983189 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.