With the rapid advancement of communication technology: smart phones, tablets and other mobile devices, some people believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the development and popularity of state-of-art technology in mobile gadgets have changed the way people communicate and connect with each other. This revolution engenders a public debate of whether the pros of these devices cancel out their drawback on human. In my standpoint, I strongly side with people who agree with this statement.
It is disputable that such tools provide people with distant communication as well as study and work. In other words, the introduction of cutting-edge smartphones and tablets has empowered people to conveniently and comfortably keep in touch with their family and friends. Furthermore, within the widespread of smartphones, social networking sites namely Facebook and Instagram enable people connect with others of diverse background and personalities. Besides, when surfing the Internet, users could keep up with the rest of the world with up-to-date news.
In spite of communication technology's advantages, over-using these mobile devices may bring out a number of cons on both mental and physical health of users. Did a person engross in games and social networking sites, he would face with difficulties in interacting with others in real life. In addition, phone addiction also leads to mental problems such as anxiety and depression as well as illness related to the lack of physical activities. In fact, it is reported that over 40% youngsters who uses smartphones are suffering such diseases day by day.
In conclusion, communication technology has become an essential part of people lif, which stems from its undeniable advantages. However, the pros of mobile gadgets are outweighed by negative impacts on the users themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-06 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | nguvl | 89 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | chirox.ame | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | tangerinelinlin | 84 | view |
| 2017-07-21 | thanhhsgs30 | 84 | view |
- process of recycling rain water
- qlkw5syt 11
- Proportion of computer ownership 73
- Nowadays the development and popularity of state of art technology in mobile gadgets has changed the way people communicate and connect with each other This revolution engenders a public debate of whether the cons of these devices cancel out their drawbac 61
- Transport delays and long journey times are a widespread phenomenon in many cities today What are the causes of this problem and how could the situation be improved 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'diseases'' or 'disease's'?
Suggestion: diseases'; disease's
...who uses smartphones are suffering such diseases day by day. In conclusion, communicati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re suffering such diseases day by day. In conclusion, communication technology ha...
^^
Line 6, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... become an essential part of people lif, which stems from its undeniable advantag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50574712644 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05783613951 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628352490421 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5327450569 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.538461538 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250113642594 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830219149655 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469857717813 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144731612969 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345363479645 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'diseases'' or 'disease's'?
Suggestion: diseases'; disease's
...who uses smartphones are suffering such diseases day by day. In conclusion, communicati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re suffering such diseases day by day. In conclusion, communication technology ha...
^^
Line 6, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... become an essential part of people lif, which stems from its undeniable advantag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50574712644 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05783613951 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628352490421 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5327450569 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.538461538 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250113642594 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830219149655 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469857717813 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144731612969 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345363479645 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.