Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things. Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon advertising and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-term dispute. In this regard, whereas loads of people are of the opinion that advertising can successfully persuade them to purchase goods, other people believe that they take no notice of advertising because it is extremely common. In my mind, advertising has the ability to convince individuals to buy items regarding psychological and financial aspects.
Obviously, humans think about stuffs which are always placed in from their eyes. Psychologically speaking, advertisements which people glance them in their everyday life, eventually pave the way to tempt individuals to buy their products. Colossal companies follow the adage “out of sight out of mind”.
In addition, financial faces of advertising play a prominent part in people’s decisions. The ubiquity of advertisements, for example, the presence of commercials in such media as TV programs, online sites, and sending text messages provides the societies’ population with huge amount of information, particularly the opportunity to compare products’ cost. Consequently, individuals might persuade to purchase thanks to apparently low-price commodities which companies offer trough ads.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t lose sight of naysayers. They claim that paying attention to common advertisements declines dramatically nowadays. Unlike the fact that exaggeration in ads must be taken into account, a remarkable number of firms lies about their products’ features, or at least they put the truth about their products’ drawbacks in shadow. Hence, people’s attention to advertising is far less than previous decades.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support vigorously the idea that population admit ever-increasing effects of ads on people’s decision making with respect to psychology and money. Even we experienced a kind of advertising in the moon, when astronauts raised the national flag of USA which was a symbol of American science prosperity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-02 | LauraTing | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 89 | view |
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors Choose which position you most ag 88
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- When you look for a job some people think salary is more important while others think work condition is more important Which one do you agree with 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'purchasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'persuade' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: purchasing
...onsequently, individuals might persuade to purchase thanks to apparently low-price commodit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, hence, if, regarding, so, whereas, at least, for example, in addition, kind of, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75409836066 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26296228452 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662295081967 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3831383116 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279911650742 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867721892366 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831067440841 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137833720352 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803131403641 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.