The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue. Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth, while others claim that it damages local industries.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion. You should write at least 250 words.
Giving freedom in goods transportation across national borders has brought various opposite views. It is believed to be an important factor of growing economy, while other people claim that it is not beneficial for local industries. This essay agrees that free movement of goods across borders is essential for economic growth.
It is clear that freedom in goods export play an important role in developing national economy. This allows the trade of both local and int
ernational industries to develop freely which affects positively businesses positively.. In the other words, free trade can facilitate open markets expanding the range of customers for businesses. National products can be approached the international customers easier due to the free trade. Manufactured in the US, for example, Apple products have reached every corner in the world and bring huge revenue to business and the USA, as well.
In contrast, the opponents insist on freeing in the that international free trade may threaten local industries. There is a danger of inevitable competition Wwhen exporting is cheaper than producing domestic goods, which means that more customers will prefer to buy exported goods. As a result, many local businesses will go out of business, thus, the unemployment will increase which damages local businesses. There is a danger of inevitable competition, there monopolies can dominate. The economies may shrink and will be extremely difficult to regulate. Moreover, Tthe vast distance travelled by food, oil, and other products is harming the environment, thus make life unsustainable. Despite these disadvantages, some measures can be done to lessen the negative effects of free trade like passing laws to protect the interest of the local businessmen and the environment. Full restriction is not anymore necessary as long as global trade can be controlled and not adversely affect the environment, as well as the country’s local industry.
In conclusion, despite convincing arguments on both sides of the debate, I strongly agree with the proponents of the global trade. It is not realistic for a country to use their source of energy, food, and manufactured goods within them. Global grade should not be fully restricted by any means,. but just needs to be well-regulated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-17 | zarutopath | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-22 | Gnaight | 84 | view |
| 2018-02-07 | Sadia276 | 69 | view |
| 2018-02-06 | rutbah amin | 91 | view |
| 2018-01-17 | Sagarjango | 91 | view |
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or to use animal products for example clothing and medicines To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian man and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 81
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge and exper 64
- Discuss the causes and the effects of widespread drug use by young people in modern society Make any recoomendations you feel are neccesary to help fight youth drug abuse 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 87, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...affects positively businesses positively.. In the other words, free trade can fac...
^^
Line 8, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...uld not be fully restricted by any means,. but just needs to be well-regulated.
^^
Line 8, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... not be fully restricted by any means,. but just needs to be well-regulated.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39166666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98496101883 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4033420967 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.05 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231316318475 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651208616687 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649010200694 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134570118419 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103255466868 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.