The given table compares the proportion of water used for different sectors in six countries in 2003.
Overall it can be seen that water was mainly used for the agricultural sector. Another interesting point is that despite being the country whose amount of water for agriculture was greater than that of any other nations China dedicated the least water for homes.
Looking at the details, agriculture was the dominant sector in China, with water usage at 87%, followed by that of Turkey at 73%. The figures for the industrial sector and homes in China were negligible at around 6%, while those in Turkey were slightly higher at 11% and 16% accordingly.
Regarding industrial usage of Canada’s water, it ranked first at 81%, after which is that of the UK at 73%. While the figure for domestic in the UK was five times higher than that for agriculture at only 4%, the data for the corresponding sectors in Russia balanced at nearly 20%.
Australia was the only nation which used water mainly for homes, with the proportion at 65%, followed by that for agriculture at over 30%. Finally, the third ranking was next to none for industry, which was the lowest one in comparison with that of the remaining countries.
- Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies while others argue that robots might have negative affect on society Discuss and give your opinion 84
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Men and women employed in full time jobs should share theresponsibilities of household chores Do you agree or disagree Share relevant personal experiences 89
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er than that for agriculture at only 4%, the data for the corresponding sectors i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, if, look, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88516746411 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53089696272 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531100478469 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2149417062 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159256109498 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898436088872 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684796204146 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121460030207 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785016229407 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.