The line graphs show the average monthly amount that parents in British spent on their children’s spotting events and the number of children who took part in three kinds of sports over a period of 6 years.
It is clear that parents’ spending on children’s sports increased constantly over the period shown. In terms of the number of children taking part, football was significantly more popular than athletics and swimming.
In 2008, British parents spent an average of roughly 20 pounds per month on their children’s sporting activities. The amount of money spent on British children’s sports by their parents rose gradually, and had risen to over 30 pounds by the year 2014.
Looking at the number of participants, in 2008 around 8 million British children took part in playing football, while only 2 million children participated in swimming clubs and less than 1 million children in Britain practice athletics. Over the following 6 years, the figure for participants in football remained stable relatively. By contrast, swimming had seen a dramatic growth in number of participants and reached approximately 4 million, which was almost twofold of its figure in 2008. Besides, there was a nearly fivefold increase in the number of children doing athletics.
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years
- Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 the second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26960784314 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89009148586 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.723204095 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.444444444 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418912424039 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180687401278 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107497101106 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275682143434 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804117484227 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.