Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The incredibly high frequency of traffic accidents has become one of the most significant social issues to be tackle. Some experts argue that governments can enforce strict laws to regulate dangerous driving, while other people suggest that the modification of drivers’ test and the road designs might play a greater role in reducing traffic accidents. This essay will discuss that governments need to make use of both measures to solve the problem.
To begin with, it is undeniable that stricter traffic laws can make a huge difference due to the high price that drivers might pay for driving offences. In many countries, people have to pay hundreds of dollars or even lose some points from their licenses when drivers break the traffic light or overspeed rules on the road. Although for some rich people, the money that costs for driving offences can be neglected, the points for their licenses cannot be ignored because they will be ineligible to drive after losing certain points. In this case, it is effective to encourage drivers to keep safety in mind.
However, punishments can only prevent some traffic accidents and I believe stricter training lessons and more reasonable road designs need to be used to deal with dangerous driving. According to statistics, more than half of the traffic accidents were caused by the drivers with insufficient driving skills and experience. Those skills and experience can be easily acquired through training and practising. If governments can modify the training system for drivers’ license, for example, prolonging the provisional license, the number of tragedies on the road will drop dramatically. On the other hand, the safety standards for road designing need to be upgraded so that there is no blind spot where accidents could happen often.
In conclusion, higher fees for driving offences can have some impact on decreasing traffic accidents and we also need other measures to solve the problem fundamentally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
- Some people think that young people should spend more of their free time at home with their families and spend less time entertaining outside Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- The diagram shows the process of recycling car batteries 61
- 4 Many high street shops have gone out of business in recent years Why do you think this has happened Is it a positive or negative development 67
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 78
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25316455696 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6932964073 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1343548587 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316006324672 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108375581961 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527240718897 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19813721739 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134032848342 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.