The bar chart provides information about the amounts of exports in petroleum products, engineered goods, gems and jewellery, agricultural products and textiles in the year 2015 and 2016. The table explains percentage-wise comparison during 2015 and 2016.
Overall, the country experienced an upward trend in petroleum export products in 2015, while an upward trend in textiles. moreover, petroleum products and engineered goods had a higher rate and lowest in agriculture products and textiles in 2016.
Earning of exported petroleum products were about 61 billion dollars, 62 billion dollars in 2015 and 2016 respectively and 3% higher than in 2015. Compared to 2015, Engineered goods rose up to 8.5% in 2016, which are around 57 billion dollars in 2015 and 61 billion dollars in 2016. Gems and jewellery products earning was about approximately 42 billion dollars in the year 2015 and it showed a gradual decrease to about 40 billion in 2016 (around 5.18%).
Exporting agricultural products, the country earned around 31 billion dollars in both 2015 and 2016 with an inconsiderable 0.81% increase in 2016. Turning into the remaining product textiles turns into less earning in 2015 which is about 25 billion dollars and rose up to around 32 billion dollars with a 15.24% increase compared to 2015.
- The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
- In some countries owning a home rather that renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think is a positive or negative situation 67
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to about 40 billion in 2016 around 518 Exporting agricultural products the coun...
^^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs with a 1524 increase compared to 2015
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77561696857 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423076923077 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 208.0 22.4926829268 925% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1066.0 112.824112599 945% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 208.0 22.9334400587 907% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 25.0 5.23603664747 477% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249344450646 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.249344450646 0.103423049105 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179219972423 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560829339326 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 106.7 13.2329268293 806% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -122.72 61.2550243902 -200% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 82.0 10.3012195122 796% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.95 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.99 8.06136585366 211% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 11.4329268293 534% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 85.2 10.9970731707 775% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 61.0 11.0658536585 551% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.